SteelerDirtFreak :: 21st Century Missional Redneck Geek

Comments

One Response to “What kind of apologist am I?”

1. 
   
   Bob, on December 29th, 2004 at 9:43 am

   Result:
   Bob scored as Evidentialist.

   You are an evidentialist! Apologetics primarily consists in showing the good reasons one has to believe the claims of Christianity. You consistently confound unbelievers with your knowledge of history, science, and Bayesian computation that you learned from John Warwick Montgomery, Gary Habermas, and Richard Swinburne.

   Classical Apologist —-63%
   Evidentialist —-63%
   Fideist —-37%
   Reformed/Presuppositional Apologist—-33%
   Atheist —-10%

   I think that might be not quite accurate. I used to be a “Classical Apologist/Evidentialist” back when I was immersed in modernism and dispensationalism.

   Now that my theology is more Reformed and my worldview is more Postmodern, I’d say I’m something not listed there yet–maybe a new designation needs to be made.

   I seek to connect with unchurched people through their experiences of mystery and imagination about divinity and beauty and purpose and desire.

   I try to connect the reality of Christian revelation with those things in new and meaningful ways.

   What is that called?

Leave a Reply